2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(see Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). Based on the foregoing legal doctrine, the Defendant’s mother submitted an application for coal seeking the Defendant’s preference to the Defendant at the trial, but this does not constitute a special change in circumstances that could change the sentence of the lower court, and there is no particular change in sentencing conditions compared with the lower court’s sentencing conditions since a new sentencing data has not been submitted. In full view of the factors revealed in the pleadings in the instant case, the lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable because it goes beyond the reasonable scope of discretion.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.