손해배상(기)
1. Defendant C's 3,035,082 won and Defendant D and E's 460,307 won and each of them jointly with Plaintiff A.
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The facts of recognition 1) Defendant C called on May 5, 2015, 17:5, the Plaintiff’s vehicle parked from the Plaintiff in the Felon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, 2015, and was in dispute with the Plaintiff A, the Plaintiff A salpted her bat around her bat, her fat face against the ebbat, her bat around her bat, and her bat around 17:5, 2015, and caused the Plaintiff’s injury to the Plaintiff, such as the Plaintiff’s batch and the open bat at the eye of the snow bat (hereinafter “the instant injury”).
2) Defendant D and E, at the same time and place as above 1, used the Plaintiff’s head debt, and used the Plaintiff’s head debt, and used the Defendant’s head debt, and used the Defendant’s head debt, and used the Defendant’s head debt, and used the Defendant’s head debt, and used the Defendant’s head debt. (hereinafter “the instant assault”).
(3) Defendant C filed a summary order of KRW 2,00,000 due to the instant injury, and Defendant D, E, and the Plaintiffs were first offenders from the Prosecutor G of the Busan District Court’s Busan District Court on September 16, 2015, and were ordered to suspend indictment for reasons of minor issues and contingent.
[Ground of recognition] Evidence No. 1-1, 2, Evidence No. 3, Evidence No. 1-1 through 7 of Evidence No. 1-7, the purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the above facts of recognition, Defendant A is liable for damages incurred by Plaintiff A due to the instant injury, and Defendant D and E are liable for damages incurred by Plaintiff B.
2. In principle, a period of time for calculating the scope of liability for damages shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 10 shall be discarded;
It shall be rejected that the parties' arguments are not separately explained.
[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 1-3, 9-1, 4, 5, 6, Eul evidence No. 2, the purport of the whole pleadings
A. The Plaintiff A appears to have been engaged in the mechanical manufacturing industry under the trade name “H” at the time of the instant accident, but the Plaintiff A submitted evidence on the actual business income.