However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

1. Violation of the Narcotics Control Act;

A. On August 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) heard the horses that he/she may request mecloptocops (one penphone, hereinafter referred to as “prophones”), a local mental medicine-friendly medicine-friendly E from 10:0 p.m.; (b) asked to purchase mecops; and (c) remitted KRW 300,000 to the Busan Bank account in the name of F, notified by E as the price for purchase of phiops, around 19:13 on the same day.

On August 14, 2016, the Defendant received an abnormal person, who was sent from H in G in the wife population G in Tae-si on August 14, 2016, approximately 0.41g of opon-phones sent from the Busan High Bus Terminal to the express bus freight, by means of an express bus freight.

The Defendant purchased philophones as such.

B. On September 2016, the Defendant administered the scopon medication 1) in a “J” restaurant located in Busan-gun, Busan-gun, around 21:00, the Defendant administered the scopon dose in a way that the scopon from among the scopons purchased under the above paragraph (a) to the scopon.

2) On November 2016, the Defendant administered 21:00 the Defendant’s front day of the Defendant’s accommodation located in K in Daegu-gun: (a) in front of the Defendant’s dwelling in K, as the foregoing paragraph (a), in a way of drinking out the volume of the instant phiphones purchased, to the arcule demanding the volume.

2. From around December 1, 2016 to December 2, 2016, the Defendant violated the Narcotics Control Act (mariju) deducted the amount of maribage collected from YK in Daegu-gu from the Defendant’s accommodation behind the Defendant’s house located in the Gyeongsan-gun, and the Defendant smoked in a way that, on October 2016, the amount of maribage collected from Marisan-si from Marisan was deducted from the tobacco’s tobacco tobacco tobacco tobacco tobacco tobacco tobacco tobacco tobacco tobacco tobacco tobacco tobacco tobacco tobacco tobacco tobacco tobacco tobacco smokeed by inserting the smoke.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. L, A photograph, E, L, or A-suspect letters, transmission photographs, telephone conversations, etc. sent by E to A, attachment of suspect cellular phone pictures, details of account transactions, response to requests for rupture appraisal, response to requests for rupture appraisal, response to requests for rupture appraisal, and investigation reports (calculated with additional charges);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of subparagraphs 1 through 3 of the seized evidence;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;