A. The plaintiff is a housing reconstruction and rearrangement project association that has a project implementation district of 19,29 square meters in the A apartment zone, such as Daegu Northern-gu C, and is a housing reconstruction and rearrangement project association that has a project implementation district of 19,29 square meters, and is authorized to establish an association on December 20, 2005, and is authorized to implement the project on March 9, 2006. On April 30, 2006, the plaintiff entered into a contract for the construction with the Non-Party Baba Co., Ltd., Ltd., and received an application for parcelling-out from the members of the association from May 2, 2006 to June 15, 2006, and held a management and disposal general meeting on July 14, 2006.

B. In 2006, the Defendant, as the owner of the real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table, located within the implementation zone of the instant reconstruction project, was a member who consented to the establishment of the Plaintiff’s association at the time of the establishment of the Plaintiff’s association, and filed an application for ownership

In addition, on July 14, 2006, the Plaintiff held a general meeting for management and disposition and approved the management and disposition plan, and on August 29, 2006, the Defendant entrusted the instant real estate to the Plaintiff on November 1, 2006.

C. However, on November 2006, the reconstruction project of this case was suspended due to the bankruptcy of the above Co., Ltd., and thereafter, C&C Co., Ltd. accepted the said Da&C Co., Ltd., but entered the above C&C Co., Ltd. legal management procedures, and the reconstruction project of this case was temporarily infinite.

After that, on November 201, the Plaintiff held an extraordinary general meeting of the Plaintiff Union on December 17, 201 to ask for the union members whether or not to dissolve an association or to resume reconstruction even if any condition is modified, and even if the conditions of the project are modified with the consent of at least 90% of the union members, the Plaintiff implements the instant reconstruction project, and explain the modification of the project plan, the modification of cash settlement money, and the modification of additional contributions, etc., and the application for parcelling-out at the time of 2006, etc. shall be null and void, and the application for parcelling-out shall be newly filed.