However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On October 3, 2016, around 06:40 on October 3, 2016, the Defendants were kneeped in the “F” smoking room operated by the victim E in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and decided to cut off the knife in the knife in the knife room, and Defendant B am the knife with the knife with the knife with the knife with the knife with the knife with the knife’s body while the knife with the knife with the employees

In addition, after being put in the Masan Tong which was next to it, the PC came from the above PC and went out of it with Defendant B.

As a result, the Defendants, together, stolen approximately KRW 3,90,000,00 in total of market prices owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. The defendant B's partial statement

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. CCTV-recording CDs (Defendant B);

1. The defendant B's partial statement

1. A legal statement of a witness;

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of the defendant A by the prosecution;

1. Some statements concerning the suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant B

1. Protocols concerning the interrogation of the suspect against the defendant A, and some statements made by the defendant B during the interrogation;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of CCTV-recording CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the said Act (Consideration of favorable circumstances, etc. in the column for the reason for sentencing);

1. Determination as to the assertion of Defendant B and defense counsel under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution

1. Defendant B was unaware of the fact that Defendant A stolen marina at the time of his allegation.

2. The above evidence duly adopted and examined by this court and the following circumstances that can be recognized by this court, namely, ① Defendant A consistently conspired with Defendant B from the police to this court, and Defendant A committed the instant crime in collusion with Defendant B, and Defendant A committed the instant crime by larceny.