beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2019.02.13 2018고단631

상습도박등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2018 Highest 631"

1. On September 23, 2016, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million with a fine of KRW 700,000 for gambling at a Suwon District Court’s Pyeongtaek Housing Site Board as an offense of gambling, and on February 3, 2017, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 70,000 for the same offense in the same court.

Around September 13, 2016, at the residence located in Ansan-si B, the Defendant connected the address B’s gambling site to become a casino game, using a computer, and transferred KRW 300,000 to the company bank account (E) account in the name of the Defendant to a small and medium enterprise limited liability company D (E) which is a gambling site operation account in the name of the Defendant, and charged cyber money in an amount equivalent to the same amount. The Defendant habitually filled up the said site by means of the aforementioned method, including: (a) the end of the said site’s drum card, and (b) the one in which the sum of the said cards is displayed to the bank and flass; and (c) from that time to February 27, 2017, the Defendant deposited KRW 2749,90,000,000 in total via the same method, from that time, from that time to February 27, 2017.

"2018 Highest 2042"

2. Around April 15, 2017, the fraud Defendant stated that “A female-friendly job offering victim G shall be paid an agreement amounting to KRW 3 million per month with a deposit of a person before a few years of his/her home,” and that “A payment shall be made within one month with a loan of KRW 3 million to be used as the agreement amount.”

However, in fact, the Defendant thought to use the money received from the victim for an illegal gambling, and had already 200 million won or more of the money for gambling between November 2015 and February 2017. Since there was no particular property owned by the Defendant, there was no intention or ability to pay the money normally even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim.

The Defendant, as above, deceiving the victim and deceiving it from the victim, is an enterprise bank under the name of the Defendant around April 15, 2017.