성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (one million won in penalty, five million won in penalty, confiscation) is too unhued and unreasonable.
2. The crime of this case is an act of arranging sexual traffic by the defendant as a business, and it is not good that the crime of this case is an act detrimental to women's sex and sound sexual morals.
However, considering all the conditions of sentencing specified in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, environment, family relationship, motive, and circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed unfair because it is too unaffortuous, and thus, the Prosecutor’s assertion is groundless.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.