However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 3, 2016, the Defendant, while drinking in the vicinity of the central park street located in the 347-ro, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, 112, reported by the Buddhist winners to 112.

Although police officers belonging to the military police station B police station, and C and D who received the report were dispatched to the site and returned home to the defendant, the defendant continued to be able to remain on the road and the above police officers prevented the defendant, and the defendant "I am, Chewing gue, and dead."

In doing the bath of “,” etc., the head of Da was 1st time with his hand, and Habbbucks of Da, Habbbucks of Habbucks, Habk’s chest was tightly sealed once by her hand, and her was tightly pushed.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 reporting processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. Investigation report on the case that interferes with the performance of official duties;

1. 112 Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the table of reported case settlement;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act for the accused to commit each of the crimes

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;