In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

Defendant

A is a tenant of 2, 117, 2, 2, 17, 300, and Defendant B's actual owner.

Where occupants or management entities of multi-family housing intend to engage in new construction, expansion, remodeling, large-scale repair, or remodeling of multi-family housing, they shall obtain permission from the competent authority.

Nevertheless, around April 25, 2012, the Defendants conspired to install steel pipe structures in the said multi-unit housing without obtaining permission from the competent authority, and thereafter illegally extended a structure equivalent to approximately 16.8 square meters in size by covering the steel pipe structure.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 98 subparagraph 6 of the Housing Act, Article 42 (2) 2 of the same Act, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act, respectively, shall be confined in a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act above, each of the orders for provisional payment (defendants);