If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On November 1, 2012, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Daegu District Court.

Although the Defendant was a person in violation of Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act, at around 19:10 on October 22, 2019, the Defendant driven an Eco-sports car under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of about 0.053% from the 2km section from the front of Seopo-si B to the front road in Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopopo-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the statement of the status of a drinking driver, an investigation report, a report on the status of a drinking driver, a report on the status of a drinking driver, and a report on the status of a drinking driver;

1. Previous records: Criminal records, etc. and inquiries and investigation reports and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order include: (a) the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects the defendant's mistake; (b) the criminal records of the same kind of fine are two times; (c) the degree of exploitation is not much severe; and (d) the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, means and result of the crime; and (e) the various conditions for sentencing as indicated in the records and arguments of the case