beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2016.02.26 2016고단4

출입국관리법위반등

Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of eight months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

(a) No person who violates the Immigration Control Act shall employ any person who is not eligible to engage in employment activities;

1) On June 12, 2014, the Defendant employed He, who entered the “G” club on the F2nd floor of F2, with the capacity to stay in E-6 (Art. / entertainment) that is not eligible for employment to drink and encourage drinking with customers.

2) On June 26, 2014, the Defendant employed I who entered the foregoing club as a entertainment entertainment entertainment worker in the capacity to stay in E-6 (Art. / entertainment) where he/she is not qualified to engage in drinking and entertainment with customers.

3) On July 16, 2014, the Defendant employed the J who entered the said club as entertainment entertainment service personnel in the capacity to stay in E-6 (Art. / entertainment) where he/she is not qualified to engage in drinking and entertainment with customers.

B. Defendant 1, as an operator of the said G’s club on June 14, 2014, arranged commercial sex acts for the following business operations: (a) around March 14, 2015, Defendant 1 received approximately KRW 500,000 as the price for commercial sex acts from the customers found at the said club; and (b) had the said H, a female employee, sexual intercourse with the guest at the K hotel near the said place; and (c) until March 14, 2015, Defendant 1 arranged commercial sex acts to the said H, I, and the said J, etc.

2) On May 1, 2015, the Defendant, as an operator of the L “L” club on the F1st century, arranged sexual traffic with the said I, from October 4, 2014 to May 9, 2015, by having the said I, a female employee, receive approximately KRW 500,000 as the price for sexual traffic from the customers found at the above club, and let the said I, an employee of the said I, a female employee, sexual intercourse with the guest under 102-dong 402 of the M. M. in the vicinity of the said club.

2. Defendant B’s Defendant A’s 1

B. (1) The term “G” club as described in paragraph (1) is known to arrange commercial sex acts by employing foreign female workers, and by providing them with knowledge that they arrange commercial sex acts.