2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff is a licensed real estate agent who runs the authorized brokerage business under the trade name of “E real estate” in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City D.

B. From early 2012, Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant B”) published an advertisement in a newspaper to sell the F factory site and building (hereinafter “instant factory”) in Yeonsu-gu Incheon, Incheon, Inc. (hereinafter “Defendant B”), which was owned by Defendant B, and made efforts such as investigating companies specialized in the sales and purchase brokerage of factories, requesting more than 100 companies, including E-real estate, to sell and sell factories, and preparing and providing Bring materials related to the instant factory.

C. In real estate, E visited the instant factory by accompanying with many companies with interesting to the purchase of the instant factory, and around June 2012, G, an employee of E-real estate, visited the instant factory, along with H, the actual owner of the Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”).

At the time, H indicated that Defendant B had an intention to purchase the instant factory to the managing director who was the managing director of Defendant B through the brokerage of real estate, but Defendant B had the purchase price amounted to KRW 12.6 billion, and H did not reach a specific agreement by presenting ten billion won.

E. Accordingly, Defendant B met H several times as a broker of the real estate of E, or proposed that “in the event of the progress of the extension work in connection with the instant factory in Defendant B, the purchase price shall be 12 billion won, and if not, 11 billion won shall be the defect.” On June 21, 2012, Defendant B prepared and presented a sale Schedule on the premise of the conclusion of the contract, stating that “the contract amount shall be kept from E real estate to E to Ek,” and made efforts to request the extension design of the instant factory to the construction office. However, Defendant C made accurate answers at the beginning of July 2012, and a large amount of loans to Defendant B’s financial status and the instant factory.