The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

1. On August 5, 201, the Defendant arranged to engage in commercial sex acts by arranging telephone conversations between F and N, male, and female, and by engaging in commercial sex acts in the Hagu-gu Hagu Hagu-gu Hagu-gu Hagu-gu 303 on the same day at F and G around 22:40 on the same day. Defendant B, around 17:00 on August 6, 201, the Defendant arranged to arrange commercial sex acts by arranging commercial sex acts in the “Magu-gu Hagu-gu Ik-gu Mak-gu, which he/she operated on his/her own,” and around F and J 18:15 on the same day at F and J 15, and arranging commercial sex acts by arranging commercial sex acts.

3. At around 03:00 on August 8, 201, Defendant C arranged to have a telephone call between F, L and Ma, who are women of sexual traffic, and women of sexual traffic, and arranged sexual traffic by engaging in sexual traffic in F, L, and M at F, 03:30 on the same day, at N2, Daegu Dong-gu N2, Daegu, 302.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each police examination protocol against F, J, M, G, or L;

1. Article 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., concerning facts constituting an offense and the punishment pursuant to relevant Articles of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;