When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2016. 3. 17. 16:30 경 충남 예산군 B에 있는 C 다방에서 싸움이 났다는 신고를 받고 출동한 충남 예산 경찰서 D 지구대 소속 경위인 피해자 E로부터 인적 사항을 질문 받자 다방 종업원 등 다수의 사람들이 있는 가운데 피해자에게 “ 이 십쌔끼야, 병신 같은 새끼야, 죽여 버린다.

approximately 10 minutes of “Abstinence” was expressed.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and E;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for criminal facts, and the selection of fines for the crime (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Do1148, Jan. 1, 201

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;