However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a BM5 car.

On November 14, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 12:50 on November 14, 2016, and led to turn to the left from the Han field University at the Han field University, Han field University, which is in accordance with Daejeon Pungdong-gu, Daejeon.

Since there is a cross-section where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely according to the signals to those engaged in driving service.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front part of the victim C(61) driver's Dorento driver's car in accordance with the new code from the vehicle line facing the negligence of left turn in violation of the signal, as the front part of the Defendant's car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, injury to the victim C of light feas, etc., which requires approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment, injury to the victim E (the 60-year-old age-old) who is a passenger of the said sirenn passenger car, such as feas, which requires approximately 4 weeks of medical treatment, injury to pressure feas, which requires approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment to the victim F (the 59-year-old passenger) of the same passenger, and injury to the victim G (the 88-year-old passenger) of the same passenger who is in need of approximately 4 weeks of medical treatment, such as mae feas, which requires approximately 4 weeks of medical treatment, and injury to the victim H (the 78-year-old passenger) of the same passenger, such as feasing feas, which requires approximately 4 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of each statute to each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Punishment provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act concerning the ordinary concurrent crimes (a punishment provided for in the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents against F with the largest penalty);

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the injury of the victim, the injury of the victim, and the comprehensive insurance.