A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

1. At around 12:50 on March 27, 2016, Defendant B, along with Defendant A, cross the crosswalk without permission at the front of the Ecafeteria located in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

그곳을 순찰 근무 중이던 서울관악경찰서 F지구대 소속 경장 G과 순경 H에게 단속되어 신분증 제시를 수차례 요구받았음에도 이를 거부하여 경장 G이 피고인을 도로교통법위반의 현행범인으로 체포하여 지구대로 함께 이동하던 중 갑자기 경장 G을 향해 때릴 듯이 팔을 휘두르고 바닥에 있던 위험한 물건인 지름 13cm 가량의 돌멩이를 집어 들고 내리찍으려고 위협하였고, 이에 경장 G이 피고인을 공무집행방해의 현행범인으로 재차 체포하여 수갑을 채우려고 하자 A이 달려들어 G을 향해 주먹을 휘둘렀고, 순경 H가 이를 제지하며 행인 2명의 도움을 받아 피고인과 A을 제지하는 과정에서 피고인은 수갑을 찬 상태로 발로 경장 G과 순경 H의 하체 부위를 수회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the control of traffic offenders and the arrest of flagrant offenders by police officers G and police officers.

2. Defendant A, at the time, at the same time, and at the same place as in paragraph (1) as above, carried the cream G to arrest him as a flagrant offender, carried the cream G, thereby putting him a drinking, and the cream h’s control over it, Defendant A carried the h’s cryp h’ and carried the cryp h’s h’.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the crackdown on traffic offenders and the arrest of flagrant offenders in police officers G and police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness G and H;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act concerning the crime: Articles 144(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Commercial concurrence;