When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is the actual manager of Pyeongtaek-si B Co., Ltd., and C is a corporation established for the purpose of recycling inorganic sludge with permission for comprehensive waste recycling business.

Where the Minister of Environment or a Mayor/Do Governor intends to issue an order for cancellation of permission or suspension of business pursuant to Article 27 to a waste treatment business operator, or to issue an order for closure or prohibition of disposal pursuant to Article 46 (7) to a person who has filed a report on waste treatment, he/she shall issue an order for disposal of wastes in storage within a specified period to the waste treatment business operator or the

Nevertheless, on July 22, 2016, the Defendant revoked the waste license due to the failure to comply with the order to renew the waste performance guarantee insurance and received an order to dispose of wastes from Pyeongtaek-si from the office of Pyeongtaek-si to January 31, 2017. However, on February 10, 2017, the charges charged with the mixture of wastes of 15,00 tons of inorganic sludge and Saturdays, which were stored in the two separate parcels of Pyeongtaek-si and Pyeongtaek-si, did not dispose of “15,00 tons of inorganic sludge, which is a waste.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the written accusation;

1. Selection of a fine and a fine under Article 65 subparagraph 21 and Article 39-3 of the Wastes Management Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;