특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and a fine of three million won for Defendant B
2. Defendant B is subject to the above fine.
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle for Echip.
On August 28, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.259% among blood transfusions on August 15:50, 2015, and continued to proceed to the direction of the “G” front of the “G,” located in the revised Sinnam-si, the Gyeonggi-si, the end of which is to the direction of the alteration from the head of the drinking-house, in the same direction.
The Defendant had a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving a motor vehicle with a safe driving by living well on the right and the right of the front.
However, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, failed to accurately operate the steering gear and brakes. The Defendant shocked the parts of the victim H (the age of 59)’s buckbucks on the right side of the road into the front part of the vehicle under the influence of alcohol, and led the victim’s bucks on the front part of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of alcohol.
Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim, such as a 10-day cutting down of a balth of the right to the right, and immediately stopped and escaped without taking measures, such as aiding the victimized person.
2. Defendant B, at around 13:00 on August 28, 2015, in the course of drinking and making soup soup, Defendant B, in a restaurant where the trade name near the sprink of the spopic spopic spopic spopic spopic 3 in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, is unknown, he/she is driving a drunkly, on the ground that he/she is unable to drive a sobry with his/her alcohol while drinking and driving a sobry.
The key of the defect Echip vehicle was fluored to him, and the vehicle was fluored by A while driving alcohol as described in paragraph 1 above.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
2. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;
3. Statement made by the police with H;
4. The actual survey report on traffic accidents; and