손해배상(산)
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 66,411,525 with respect to the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from March 18, 2015 to August 23, 2019.
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) was awarded a contract for the new apartment construction work, and subcontracted the above apartment model housing construction work to Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”) around February 2015.
The above Model House Corporation is included in the above apartment construction contract contracted by Defendant B, and the lot number before cancellation due to the implementation of the FF land development project in Gwangju City, which is within the place of apartment construction.
G. hereinafter “instant construction site”
Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant D”).
(1) The pipeline Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “instant Corporation”) in the course of the said Model Cargo System
Defendant D re-subcontracted the part of the pipe installation (H entered into a contract in the name of the Company). Defendant D re-subcontract subcontracted the pipe installation part to H.
(2) On March 3, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) from around March 3, 2015, engaged in the installation of a sprinkler at the same construction site from around March 10, 2015; (b) around 10:00 on March 18, 2015, the Plaintiff: (c) engaged in the singinging pipe works in the ceiling working space in the instant construction site; (d) the Plaintiff: (c) caused a temporary timber with a thickness of 3 centimeters in height of about 2.5 meters between the wall walls of the model singice, thereby cutting down the main pipe; (c) the Plaintiff fell on the floor (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).
A. The Plaintiff suffered injury, such as scarcity, etc. due to the instant accident.
On the other hand, at the construction site of this case, there were various field offices of Defendant B and Defendant C.
Defendant B’s safety manager conducted safety education every day at the construction site by gathering and providing safety education to the public, such as wooden pipes, windows, and electrical pipes, in addition to piping pipes.
The chief of the site of Defendant C and Defendant D and their employees are called the site of this case.