Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

2. The crime of this case was committed by allowing the Defendant to record false facts in the computerized information processing system for family register through disguised marriage, and the nature of the crime is not good. However, the Defendant’s mistake is divided and reflected, and the Defendant does not have the same criminal record, etc. is favorable to the Defendant.

In full view of such circumstances and the age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment of the defendant, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the conditions of the sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the defendant's appeal is with merit.

Criminal facts

The summary of the facts charged and the summary of the evidence recognized by the court are as stated in each corresponding column of the judgment of the court below, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 228 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 229, 228 (1), and 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 229, 228 (1), and 30 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014).

1. Prior to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the sentencing conditions as set forth in the above order shall be determined by comprehensively taking account of the following factors.