beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.05.24 2015고단2726

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eleven months.

The seized evidence Nos. 1 (5,000 dunes Bas) and Nos. 2 (10,000 dunes Bas).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 2726"

1. The Defendant, together with C, D, E, and around April 1, 2010, at the center of “F” located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul around April 1, 201, and D, with the victim G, who was aware of D, purchased a warehouse where D’s high-ranking public officials raised from the origin, such as the so-called paro, the National Information Institute, etc., and the former president’s non-funds are kept in the form of golding, etc.

To make an investment in money to us, 5 gold bars (the market value equivalent to KRW 220 million) shall be purchased and invested from the pre-owner, and an investment shall be given to purchase a warehouse for non-financial funds with the money, and the Government will make two times the principal after having finished work within one month, after having sold it to the Government, and receive an additional amount of KRW 3 billion with the contribution amount.

In addition, it will also be returned to the Agricultural Cooperatives.

This day is proceeding to extremely, and it is so called Bana.

“Falsely speaking to the purport that “A victim was fluent and similar to the former senior public officials having a fluorial relationship over several times,” and around that time C sent pictures to the mobile phone by using the victim’s photographic photo stored in the warehouse for non-funds.

However, in fact, since the former president's funds did not exist as being paid by the defendant, etc., and all the words of the defendant, etc. were false, there was no ability to perform as agreed even if they received money from the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, in sequence with C, D, and E, deceivings the victim by such words and acts, and was issued 20 million won in cash (one million won in cash, 15 million won in cash, and 14 copies in check in front) as the same day of investment by the injured party.

2. On April 23, 2010, the Defendant, along with C and D, was urged by the victim to return the investment funds related to the crime under Paragraph 1 of the above Article from the victim, and the victim’s “before work is well progress, and the Defendant’s passbook to exempt the Defendant from the liability of the former caution (which is recognized by the government).