When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Defendant on June 20, 2014. 23:19 around 23:19 E summary operated by the Victim D in Sungnam-si C

Despite the fact that business hours from the victim to 02:00 have been notified in advance within the main point, the victim continued to engage in severe humiliation without justifiable grounds, and threatened the victim as if he were at the time of the victim, which interfered with the victim's main business for about two hours and interfered with the victim's business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing period of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is the period of repeated crime as of December 25, 2013 when the defendant was released from prison due to a large number of violent crimes and the same crime, etc., but it appears that the defendant led to a confession of the crime and his depth, and that the defendant would drink the remaining alcoholic beverages after calculating the drinking value in advance, and he would drink the alcoholic beverages remaining after the lapse of business hours, and there is only two hours of alcoholic beverages, and there seems to be no particular other damage. In light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of the instant case including the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim, the punishment shall be determined as per the order.