beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2015.05.26 2015고단84

사기

Text

1. Defendant A is punished by a fine of KRW 5,00,00, and Defendant B and C are punished by a fine of KRW 4 months, Defendant D and E are punished by a fine of KRW 2,00,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A from March 3, 2008 to June 30, 2014, the head of G apartment management office, Defendant B from October 1, 2006 to September 30, 2010, and Defendant C from October 1, 2006 to September 30, 2010, respectively, served as the head of each apartment unit's representative council from October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2014. Defendant D is a person who is engaged in construction business under the trade name of H and Defendant E.

The Defendants submitted to the person in charge of permanent residence a false contract on the construction amount of the J Project (50% of the Si expenses, 50% of the self-payment) which is provided at the permanent residence of the victim, and proposed to reduce the self-payment by receiving a refund of the construction cost as unrefilled from the construction company after the completion of the construction work if the Defendants paid the unrefilled construction cost by combining the self-payment and the subsidies received from the permanent residence.

1. On March 9, 2009, when Defendant A, B, and B were selected as a subsidized project operator of the J project that the council of occupants' representatives of the above apartment complex composed of them was to be conducted in the permanent residence, the above apartment management office around March 13, 2009, and the fact was that the above apartment management office entered into a construction contract with Defendant E and the above apartment construction work for the construction cost of KRW 43 million, but the false contract for the construction cost of KRW 60,000,000 for the same day was to be submitted to K who is a public official in charge of apartment management.

Therefore, the Defendants, by deceiving the above K, received 21 million won under the name of subsidies from the permanent resident of the victim to the account of the council of occupants' representatives from the date of the permanent resident of the victim on March 19, 2009, and 9 million won in total and 3 million won under the same name as around May 12, 2009.

In the end, the Defendants conspired to obtain 30 million won as a subsidy from the permanent residence of the victim and acquired it by fraud.

2. On November 1, 2011, Defendant A, C, and C’s co-principal activities, Defendant A, and C are a co-principal of the projects conducted by the council of occupants’ representatives at permanent residence.