However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, the execution of the above fine.

No person shall receive any consideration and lend the means of access.

Nevertheless, on August 30, 2019, the Defendant received a proposal to the effect that, among those discovered to obtain a loan, the Defendant would lend 3.9% of the annual interest, if he sent an identification card and e-mail card to 30 million won,” and sent a e-mail card connected to the account under the name of the Defendant in order to obtain a loan, through the post office’s house.

Accordingly, the defendant would receive compensation and lent the means of access.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s petition and written statement of the victim;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning details of transactions;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 49 (4) 2 and 6 (3) 2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for confinement in a workhouse (in cases where a sentence of suspended execution of punishment is invalidated or revoked and the defendant fails to pay a fine);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (limited to the case where the defendant has been punished for a crime of a long different type of crime, and considering the fact that there is no economic situation as a beneficiary under the National Basic Living Security Act and there is no good health condition, and the circumstances of this case);