A Imprisonment of six months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of one million won, and Defendant C shall be punished by imprisonment of ten months.

(b).

"2015 Highest 101"

1. The Defendants’ co-principal Defendant A is the business owner operating sexual traffic establishments with the trade name “E” on the lease of Nos. 307, 803, and 807 of the D Building in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City. Defendant B and Defendant C are the employees of the said establishments.

On October 21, 2014, the Defendants conspired to receive KRW 1.50,00 from male customers of F, etc. who found the above D Building Nos. 307, 803, and 807 through Internet advertisements, and had female employees, such as G, to have sexual intercourse with male customers.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic.

2. No person who has committed any act or facilities harmful to juveniles in school environmental sanitation and cleanup zones;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated sexual traffic business establishments with the trade name "E", such as Paragraph 1, located in the school environmental sanitation and cleanup zone located in the school environmental sanitation and cleanup zone located in approximately 172 Korean University, 120, Do-dong, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, in a temporary border like Paragraph 1.

The defendant is a person who operates the business of the trade name "I" in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Htel 1113.

From February 2015 to 16:20 on February 25, 2015, the Defendant reported the Internet advertisement at the said “I” business establishment, and received the payment of KRW 30,000 won from the male grandchildren, KRW 50,000,00 from KRW 110,000,00 among them, and had a female sexual traffic, such as J, etc. enter into a sexual intercourse with the Defendant, which was prepared in advance for the sex instruments of the said male grandchildren, on the condition that KRW 50,00,000 won and KRW 80,000,000,000 from the male grandchildren.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

"2015 Highest 101"

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police interrogation protocol on K, L, M, or N;

1. Seizure records;

1. Each photograph and output "2015 Highest 1028" (Defendant C);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to J police officers;

1. Reporting on detection;

1. Records of seizure; and