성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(장애인강간)등
Defendant
In addition, all appeals filed by the respondent for attachment order and the prosecutor are dismissed.
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
가. 피고인 겸 피부착명령명령청구자(이하 ‘피고인’이라 한다) ⑴ 사실오인 및 법리오해 ㈎ 성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(장애인위계등간음)의 점에 관한 공소사실은 “강제로”라는 단어를 빼면 피고인이 피해자의 의사에 반하여 성관계를 하였는지 여부, 어떠한 방법으로 위력을 행사하였는지가 불분명하여 공소제기의 절차가 형사소송법 제254조 제4항에 위반하여 무효이거나 공소사실 그 자체만으로는 범죄가 성립하지 않는다.
In addition, the lower court applied the legal doctrine of Article 8(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse to this case. However, in light of the principle of clarity in penal provisions and the more serious legal penalty under Article 6(5) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, it cannot be analogically interpreted, and the “compactivity” of sexual intercourse by force against the disabled person should be more strictly recognized.
Therefore, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles on the concept of “defensive power”.
㈏ 피고인이 피해자와 성관계를 맺은 것은 사실이나 이는 피해자와 합의하에 이루어진 것이고 피해자에게 위력을 행사한 사실은 없으며, 피해자를 강제로 추행한 사실도 없다.
The only evidence corresponding to the facts charged in this case is the victim's statement, and the victim's statement is contradictory to some important parts, and there is sufficient possibility of being contaminated through repeated learning, etc. by the third party.
Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which convicted each of the facts charged in this case on the sole basis of the victim's statement is erroneous in misconception of facts.
The sentencing of the court below (five years of imprisonment, 80 hours of order to complete sexual assault treatment programs, and 5 years of order of disclosure notification) is too unreasonable.