However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 4, 2018, around 19:50, the Defendant discovered that the victim D (the victim of 37 years of age) who is an employee of security service company was drinking alcohol, and the victim Daceddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act for the crime of intimidation [the scope of recommendation] [the grounds for sentencing] under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Confiscation Act: The punishment shall be determined by taking into consideration all the circumstances, such as the following: (a) the mitigated area of sentence [the person subject to special mitigation] [the person subject to special mitigation] [the normal conditions favorable to the sentence] [the person subject to a sentence] reflects the circumstances; (b) the agreement is reached with the victim; (c) the mental disorder (class 3) of the modern branch seems to have an influence on the crime: (d) the person was in bad condition by carrying a lethal weapon; (b) the person was punished for a crime of the same kind; and (c) the defendant's age, character