beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.10.22 2015고단3346

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving Cknife car.

On March 27, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol of 0.137% of blood alcohol level on March 12:42, 2015, and led the said car to proceed bypassing the three-way intersection of 12 front of the Seoul Guro-gu, Guro-gu, Seoul to the area of the Gawing market at the jurisdiction of the Young-gu, Seoul.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to confirm whether a person engaged in driving service has a vehicle or a person entering the intersection by reducing the speed prior to a right-hand or temporarily stopping, and to drive safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected the above drinking and caused the victim D to go beyond the road due to the negligence of the victim D (the age of 92) leading the crosswalk, which was caused by the Defendant’s failure to neglect it due to the influence of drinking, and caused the victim D to go beyond the road.

The Defendant continued to operate the brake system accurately due to the above influence of drinking, and due to the negligence going beyond the brake line as it is, the Defendant was driven by E (35 years old) who was driving in accordance with the new heading from the south-ro basin to the string market side of the Southern-ro basin, and received the panion in front of the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the victim D’s occupational negligence in a 8-day level of sacriffy and alley to the extent that the Defendant suffered from the victim D’s sacriffy, and attempted to flee without taking necessary measures, such as immediately stopping the vehicle at the site and providing rescue to the victim, even though the said sacracking car is damaged to meet the repair cost of KRW 619,012, such as the exchange of a

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A E-document;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. A written diagnosis and a written estimate;