관리처분계획 고시처분취소
1. All of the plaintiffs' lawsuits of this case are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On May 10, 2002, the Defendant: (a) on April 10, 2002, designated a single unit planning zone as D; (b) determined the F district unit planning (hereinafter “instant renewal determination”); (c) on April 7, 201, part of the D district E-ro Seoul Special Metropolitan City public notice; (d) the content of which is 20,610 square meters, including 152 square meters G in Gwangjin-gu, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul; (e) 152 square meters, 91.9/145 square meters, 35.7/73 square meters, Q93 square meters, 122 square meters, 79/129 square meters, 79/129 square meters, 13 square meters, 3000 square meters, 400 square meters in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which were owned by the Foundation; and (e) the Plaintiff’s ownership transfer of 35/75 square meters in Seoul Special Metropolitan City and 944.7/5 square meters in lots.
Among them, 52.5/109 square meters were designated as joint development zones.
B. According to the instant renovation decision, two lots of land C were divided into H zones and joint development zones, and they were incorporated into the H zones and joint development zones respectively. On February 20, 2012, C sexual parties proposed to the head of Gwangjin-gu, Seoul as soon as possible remove and newly construct a new site for land C incorporated into H zones on the ground that the risk of collapse of sexual parties is likely to occur to the head of Gwangjin-gu.
On the other hand, a resident proposal was made to exclude the 070m2 in Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu, which is owned by him from the joint development area.
C. The head of Gwangjin-gu Office, on March 31, 2014, includes the contents that the Defendant would receive a resident’s proposal for C Sungsung and Hoho Industry.