2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The Defendant is a legal entity that operates the Gangnamnam Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”). The Plaintiff is the wife, Plaintiff B, and C of the network D (hereinafter “the deceased”). The Plaintiff is the deceased’s children.

B. On September 29, 200, the Deceased had been subject to crypology, crypology, crypology, and crypology for sexual cancer treatment at the Defendant Hospital on September 29, 200. The Deceased was subject to crypology treatment from November 200 to January 200, and was completely cured without a recurrence of sexual cancer. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 17093, Sep. 29, 200>

C. On April 26, 2010, the Deceased was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital due to symptoms, such as sediment and singching, etc.

6. 10. Institutional Dominated Treatment, etc. was discharged.

The Deceased, even on April 6, 2012, runs home to the Defendant Hospital due to symptoms of difficulty and breathesis.

4.10. Institutional co-marization and artificial post-marization;

4. The receipt of 18. Insuasion and restoration alcohol, respectively;

5.2. Discharge. D.

On May 30, 2012, the Deceased was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital on the grounds that there was a new symptoms when he takes food, and on the same day, the medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital performed an institutional marrition to the Deceased on the same day. In order to narrow the surgery and expand the engine air, a large quantity of a large quantity of transfusions occurred due to the outbreak of a marrious marc in which the skin was boomed toward the chest by the engine.

Accordingly, the chest outside of the Defendant hospital and the doctor performed an artificial blood transfusion coloning surgery by controlling the part of the spatch fever of the spatched beer and combining the artificial blood transfusion, and the doctor in charge performed the scheduled surgery.

After that, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital observe the progress of the Deceased and provides a preserved treatment.

6.14. Artificial Explosion;

6. 18. 18. Embryptive gymmetrics carried out, respectively, and the Deceased’s gymical gymnasium.

6. 21. The discharge was made on 21.

E. On February 4, 2013, the Deceased was killed in the Defendant Hospital, and was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital, and the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital was on the Deceased.