beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.04.25 2017가합513526

손해배상(의)

Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff A is a person who has undergone the prone extension surgery in the Fsung surgery located in Gangnam-gu operated by the defendant, while the plaintiff C is the husband of the plaintiff, the plaintiff Eul is the father of the plaintiff, and the plaintiff Eul is the father of the plaintiff, the plaintiff Eul, and the plaintiff

B. On June 10, 2011, Plaintiff A received from the Defendant a flexible scopic surgery (hereinafter “instant surgery”) that inserting each of 270C (hereinafter “instant universal structure”) of the universal elements of the net compound (gel) produced by the Defendant into both sides of the U.S. ELLLS Stilone-Filed Breast’s 270C (hereinafter “instant universal structure”).

Since then, from May 2013 to May 2013, Plaintiff A received additional treatment from the Defendant on the part of the instant surgery, as well as on the reflect of the part of the instant surgery.

다. 원고 A은 2016. 4. 21. 원고 B를 출산하고 모유 수유를 하던 중 2016. 7. 말경 좌측 유방에서 실리콘 젤 형태의 끈끈한 점도의 액체가 흘러나오는 것을 확인하였다.

Accordingly, on August 17, 2016, Plaintiff A confirmed that the instant universal type of water, which was inserted into the left-hand bank of the Ynman University, was burned out and then flow out through an excursion ship, and subsequently, Plaintiff A received neither sprinkling nor sprinking treatment nor sprinking treatment to remove the instant universal type of water inserted into both sides of the instant hospital on August 26, 2016.

Plaintiff

A, even after receiving the above publication-type removal, etc., there is a concern about the occurrence of the type of practical container, etc. due to the diesel ingredients of solid containers being milked in the bank. D.

Plaintiff

B Since the birth of G, the Plaintiff received breast-feeding from the Plaintiff around July 2016, and around July 2016, the Plaintiff suspended breast-feeding from the time when the Plaintiff confirmed that the diesel flow from the left bank.

On the other hand, according to the findings of the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety conducted around January 2017, it was confirmed that Plaintiff A's breast oil flows out of the instant universal type of concrete, which flows out from Plaintiff A's breast oil.

[Ground of recognition] dispute.