The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning, the lower court was justifiable to have determined the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation contrary to logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the status of a person who administers another’s business in breach of trust or intentional breach of trust, without exhaust all necessary deliberations as alleged in the grounds of

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.