위증
Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.
1. On November 2006, the Defendants knew that the land and buildings in the name of E F, F, 302 were expropriated and that the apartment complex occupancy right to be constructed in the G district in the name of E (hereinafter “the occupancy right of this case”) was generated from the compensation for the said expropriation, and, in collusion with the name defective persons who will play the role of H and fake E, decided to commit the crime of fraud by selling the right to move in the name of E in the manner of E.
The Defendants shall obtain information on the right to move out in the name of Defendant A through such public offering and provide it to accomplices. Defendant B shall act as a fake E and the person who will purchase the right to move out of the name of Defendant A, while taking charge of the remaining payment together with the person who will act as a fake E, and H shall act as a forgery of the resident registration certificate and the certificate of personal seal impression in his name (one name), and H, around January 2007, sold the right to move out in the name of E to the J by letting the person who has lost his name and sold the right to move out in the name of E and receive the down payment under the name of the down payment from J on February 6, 2007. However, it seems that Defendant B received the down payment of KRW 20 million from him on January 1, 2007.
The prosecutor's investigation records (198 pages 198, 205 pages). 20 million won were delivered to K account on February 6, 2007, and 35 million won was transferred to L account and 71 million won was acquired by fraud (hereinafter "the instant fraud crime").
1. On February 6, 2013, Defendant A appeared at the Seoul Western District Court 407, Seoul Western District Court 407, which was located in Mapo-gu, Seoul, Seoul, as a witness of the above case, to take an oath against H, and to testify.