When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 21, 2017, from around 17:51 to 17:58 of the same day, the Defendant sent the Defendant a cell phone DKakao Stockholm, the Defendant’s cell phone from around 17:51 to 17:58 of the same day, and the fact that the Defendant did not have given birth to the Defendant, despite the fact that the Victim C gave unmarried birth to the Defendant, the Defendant sent the Defendant’s cell phone DKakao Kakao Stockholm, the Defendant’s cell phone called “C” to the addressee, suggesting that the Defendant was the content of the Victim, and then, the Defendant would be a middle school.

’, ‘ 배워 먹지 못하게 말을 그렇게 하니 ’, ‘ 너 같은 애들이 제일 싫어’, ‘ 아이 존재 숨긴 채 그렇게 뻔뻔하게 사는 거.’, ‘ 너 같은 애들이 제일 나쁜 거 아니 ’, ‘ 사랑받아도 모자랄 아이를 본인 호적에도 안 올리고 처녀 인척 뻔뻔하게 사는 너 대단해.’, ‘ 니가 낳고’, ‘ 니 동생으로 호적 들어가 있잖아 ^^.’, ‘ 리틀 맘클럽도 흔적 있던데 C 아’, ‘ 낳고 버리는 거보다 더 사악해 넌.’, ‘ 아니 네 11살이겟네

Along with this, the phrase “componies” was transmitted.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning data to cut down the Kakao Stockholm conversation;

1. Article 70 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, etc., concerning facts constituting a crime and the selection of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;