When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who drives a car owned by B as a duty.

On April 24, 2014, at around 01:45, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol with 0.173% of alcohol concentration 0.173%, and led the two-lanes of five lanes in front of the Han River Hospital, which is in the error Dong-dong in Daejeon Jung-gu, in the direction of an error-distance outflow.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall accurately operate the steering system, brakes and other devices of the motor vehicle, shall not drive the motor vehicle at a speed or in a manner that impedes and impedes others according to the traffic conditions of the road and the structure and performance of the motor vehicle, and has the duty of care to report the traffic situation well and to prevent accidents in advance by driving the motor vehicle safely.

Nevertheless, when the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so, the Defendant fleded without taking any measures to 452,578 won of repair costs by leaving back the rear pandeer of the ero body taxi driven by the victim D(52 years of age, south) who driven by the victim D (the 52 years of age, south) who had sent a signal atmosphere at the front of the same lane ero-road intersection, such as the e-mail e-mail.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Investigation report on the actual condition of traffic accidents, report on the detection of a driver, and report on the circumstantial statement of a driver;

1. Application of separate Acts and subordinate statutes to repair costs estimates and photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning the facts of crime, Articles 148, 54 (1), 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the defendant, confession, and is in depth against the victim, and agreed with the victim.

This is the same.