The defendant shall obtain money from B who is an applicant for compensation, KRW 750,00, and KRW 30,00.

1. Around August 27, 2013, the Defendant made a false call to the victim B at the Defendant’s residence located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, 201 Dong 809, and made a false call to the victim B to the effect that “In the Republic of Korea, the Defendant is the representative of the G travel agency, and is able to find out the travel to Dongnam-dong.”

However, the defendant was not the representative of the G travel agency, but did not have the intention or ability to allow the victim to arrange travel.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, was delivered KRW 750,000 to the national bank account under the name of the Defendant’s mother, for the purpose of “6-day-day-long-day-day-long-day-long-day-long-day-long-day-long-day-long-day-long-day

2. On November 8, 2013, the Defendant, by making phone calls to the victim C in the same manner as described in paragraph (1), deceiving the victim in a manner as described in paragraph (1), and was given 3,510,000 won from the Defendant’s mother-friendly national bank account in the name of the Defendant’s child, for the same day as “6-day-day-day-day-day-day-day-day-day-day-day-day-day-day-day-long travel

3. On December 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) made a false statement to the victim C by telephone, stating that “The travel should be revoked by a mistake in the passport; (b) on the face of a week, five million won of the travel cancellation fee shall be revoked; and (c) the Defendant would return KRW 4,300,000, which deducted KRW 700,000 from the travel cancellation fee.”

However, the defendant was not required to pay a cancellation fee because he did not register the travel schedule.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 5,000,000 won from the national bank account in the name of the Defendant’s mother, under the pretext of the Defendant’s fee for cancellation of travel on the same day.

4. On November 8, 2013, the Defendant, by making a phone call to the victim D and deceiving the victim in the same manner as that described in paragraph 1, in a manner like that of paragraph 1, is the name of "4-day and 5-day-day-day-day-day-day-day-day-day-day-day-day-day-day-day-day-day-long-