When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On February 22, 2020, at the main point of “C” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul on February 22, 2020, the Defendant reported 112 to the effect that “I will flick customers with a view to flicking, flicking, flicking, flicking,” and sent to the police box affiliated with the Seoul Gangnam-gu Police Station D commander of Seoul Gangnam Police Station, to listen to the Defendant’s statement in order to verify the details of the report and identification of the Defendant, and pushed the police officer’s flicking, etc. one time by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties of police officers regarding the handling of 112 reported cases, protection of people's lives, bodies, and property, prevention, suppression, investigation, etc. of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The act of assaulting police officers who perform official duties in sentencing grounds under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act requires strict punishment for obstruction of performance of official duties which harm the legitimate exercise of public authority.

However, considering the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant reflects his mistake and has no record of criminal punishment, the punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of various sentencing conditions shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, means and consequence, etc.