However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 15, 2014, at around 00:45, the Defendant: (a) reported 112 that he shouldered the alcohol disease at the Cju shop located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and assaulted E of the defect E, who was called out after having received a report, to have the captain returned home, the police box affiliated with the Seoul Coast Guard Police Station D, which was called out by the Defendant, by taking a bath for the Defendant’s heading “bats and spats” while taking a bath for the Defendant’s heading.

In order to protect the defendant, the defendant continued to sit in the front of the above main line and to protect the defendant against the disturbance, he assaulted by cutting the ebbbbb, eb, eb, and walking e in hand by hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he/she was under a stay of execution of imprisonment for a crime of the same kind as the sentencing of Article 62(2) of the Social Service and Criminal Act, the punishment as the order shall be determined by taking into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is considerably unfair; (b) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment as shown in the record