성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., both types of punishment) is too unreasonable.
2. The Defendant made a confession and reflects in depth the mistake while making a confession, and is an initial offender.
However, the instant case is a case in which the Defendant purchased a camccoer in advance in the shape of a motor vehicle heat, and the victim taken the cambs or the parts of the body of the victim who listed the subway stairs, and the nature of the instant crime is not easy, and there is no special change in circumstances that can determine the punishment differently from the original instance.
In addition, in full view of the motive, means and result of the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, health status, criminal records, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable.
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act because the defendant's appeal is without merit.