2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant include: (a) the fact that the defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case through confinement for about four months; (b) the fact that the defendant has a family member to support the defendant; and (c) the defendant has difficulty in economic situation.

However, each of the crimes of this case is a normal situation where each of the crimes of this case was committed by the defendant without the intention or ability to pay the acquisition price, deceiving the victim without the intention or ability to pay the acquisition price, thereby obtaining property benefits equivalent to the acquisition price, and by deceiving the money under the name of the borrowed money without the intent or ability to pay it to the victim He. In light of the criminal law and the frequency of the crime, the nature of the crime is poor, the damage amount caused by each of the crimes of this case is about 64,242,462 won, the damage amount caused by each of the crimes of this case is about 64,242,462 won, and the defendant did not make a considerable effort to pay it to the victim C, and no agreement was reached between the defendant and the victim until the trial was reached. The defendant was absent on January 16, 2014, which was the date of the first instance trial, and the judgment was made in the absence, and the defendant was detained and the defendant was sentenced twice the same kind of crime.

In full view of the above favorable circumstances and conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstances after the commission of the crime, and other various circumstances, which are conditions for sentencing as shown in the trial process, even if considering all favorable circumstances for the Defendant, it cannot be deemed unfair since the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and it is in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.