[Attachment 1] [Attachment 1] among [Attachment 38.7 square meters on the Daejeon Seo-gu D road] to the Plaintiff.

2. The judgment of service of public notice of judgment on Defendant B and E among the Defendants listed in the [Attachment List]: Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act

3. The judgment regarding the confession of judgment against the Defendants other than the above Defendants [the list] deemed to be a confession of judgment against the Defendants again: Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act

4. The Plaintiff’s judgment on the Defendant (Appointed Party) is not sufficient to accept the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant (Appointed Party) on the primary and conjunctive claims, such as the Plaintiff’s “the changed cause of claim” as indicated in the evidence No. 1 through No. 7 (including the number), and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

5. The plaintiff's conclusion [Attachment of the list of the defendants] cited the plaintiff's main claim against the defendants again, and the plaintiff's main claim and conjunctive claim against the defendant (the appointed party) are all dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.