If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On October 15, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 15:00 on the Seo-gu Seo-gu Seoul apartment sperm, the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, destroyed the property equivalent to KRW 30,000 at the market price by carrying the victim’s stick for the visually impaired who is the visually impaired (math, 63 years of age) with a view to “to die the same human garbage.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 366 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although it is necessary to punish a person in light of the fact that he/she committed a crime again even though he/she had the same record as the sentencing reason under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the fact that he/she damaged stick of the visually impaired, it is necessary to punish him/her, taking into account the fact that he/she is against the punishment, that he/she is over the victim after the institution of public prosecution, and that he/she fully agreed after compensating the victim for 7