양수금
1. Revocation of the part against the defendant ordering payment in excess of 13,784,602 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and that part; and
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following cases. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Part 11 to 10th day of the first instance judgment (hereinafter referred to as "the second 4th 6th 17th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 97th 6th 97th 97th 97th 97th 97th 97th 97th 97th 97th 97th 97th 976th 97th 97th 97th 97th 97th 97th 97th 97th 97th 97th 97th 97th 97th 97th 97th 97th 97th 12th 97th 14th 97th 97th 97th 97th 14th 97th 97th 97th 97th 14th 905th 94th 97th 97th 14th 94th 94th 94th 97th 1.
3. If so, the defendant is obligated to pay KRW 13,784,602 to the plaintiff. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant against the defendant shall be accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit.
Since the part against the defendant ordering payment in excess of the above money in the judgment of the court of first instance is unfair, the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the cancellation part shall be dismissed, and the defendant's remaining appeal is dismissed as it is groundless