beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.03.30 2016고단4159

공무집행방해

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 21, 2016, at the main point of "E located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, in order for the Defendants to see that the slope G belonging to the F District Unit of the F District in Ulsan-do, the head of the Defendant B, who was called out after receiving a report of 112, is going to the Defendant B, and reported to the head of the Gu and reported to the 119, thereby preventing the Defendants from going to the Defendant B, and thereby preventing the Defendant A from going to the Defendant on board the part of the first-aid vehicle called to the Defendant, and the Defendant A did not keep the chest part of G by hand.

will not be the auditor of the hearing.

recording with smartphones.

The defendant B made a threat that he will be at issue in photographing, and the defendant B sated him together with the clothes of G in his hand and sated G in several times, and sated the rank attached to the shoulder of G in the latter.

The Defendants conspired to commit the act of violence or intimidation against the police official, thereby obstructing the legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch of G 112 reports.

2. 피고인 B의 단독 범행 피고인은 제 1 항과 같은 일 시경, 같은 장소에서 위 G의 지원 요청을 받고 출동한 울산 남부 경찰서 F 지구대 소속 경장 H이 피고인에게 119 구급 차를 타고 병원에 가서 치료를 받을 것을 권유하자 H에게 욕설을 하며 발로 H의 허벅지 부위를 3회 찼다.

As such, the Defendant assaulted the police officer H, thereby obstructing H’s legitimate execution of duties concerning H’s 112 dispatch of duty.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statement - On the second trial date, all of which the Defendants made a statement, the Defendants led to confession of facts constituting an offense on the date of the second trial. On the fourth trial date, the Defendants asserted legitimate defense or legitimate acts as to facts constituting the offense of paragraph 1, and the facts constituting the offense of paragraph 2 as to the facts constituting the offense of paragraph 2. The police G that has observed the direct statement attitude, etc. - The results of each witness examination as to HCVR Do, HCVR Do, and the CD that has taken into account as evidence (whichever is called 'HCVR Dom Dom-201021092. dav' file reproduction results).