beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.08.19 2016나13100

손해배상(자)

Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) KRW 438,294,101.

Reasons

The plaintiff is the victim of the traffic accident below (hereinafter referred to as "accident of this case"), and the defendant is the insurer of C D D D D D D D D D D D D (hereinafter referred to as "drick").

On February 25, 2013: On or around 14:50 on February 25, 2013, the accident site: The circumstances leading to the accident in front of the E-ownership station located in Yong-gu E-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu: as specified in the attached Form “traffic accident.”

[Reasons for Recognition] According to the facts without dispute, Gap evidence 3, Gap evidence 4, and Gap evidence 15 (including each number), and the facts of the whole purport of the pleading, the defendant is liable for compensation for all damages suffered by the plaintiff who suffered the above accident by the Maritime Vehicle as the insurer of the Maritime Vehicle.

In relation to the judgment on the defendant's assertion, the defendant argued to the purport that since the lock distance referring to the lock distance, which the plaintiff left behind at the time of the accident of this case, was negligent in not avoiding the lock, even after hearing sound, it shall be considered to compensate for the damages that the defendant should compensate for. However, it is not sufficient to recognize the above facts only with the statement of evidence No. 2-7, which seems consistent with this, and even if all the evidence submitted by the defendant are combined, it is insufficient to recognize the above facts. Thus, the above argument by

In addition to the matters stated separately below the scope of liability for damages, each item of the attached Table of the calculation of damages shall be as follows, and the amount less than KRW 1 and less than monthly shall be discarded.

The calculation of the present price shall be calculated at the present price at the time of the accident of this case in accordance with the simple discount method that deducts intermediary interest at the rate of 5/12 per month, and the number of heading shall be calculated only up to the fourth decimal place.

It is rejected that the parties' arguments have not been separately explained.

[Ground of recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence 5 to 7, Gap evidence 10 to 13, Eul evidence 1 (including each number), the H hospital head of this court, I hospital head, J hospital head, and K hospital head of this court.