However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 12:30 on June 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim D who was reporting on the duty of guard at the Da apartment guard room in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, without any justifiable reason, of drinking alcohol at the said room; (b) dumping the victim D’s shoulder by hand; (c) dumping it by drinking; (d) dumping it by drinking; and (e) dumping it on the floor; and (e) continuously dumping it on the floor; and (e) continuously holding the victim C apartment management office, the market price of which is the sum of 12.10,000 won in the sum of the market price of the victim C apartment management office, which is equivalent to the 1210,000 won in possession, by force, destroyed the victim’s dump by destroying the victim’s shoulder on the floor and impeding the victim’s 137 minutes.

2. The injured Defendant, like the date and time stated in Paragraph 1, and Paragraph 1, committed harm to the reputation of the part of an unidentified part that requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim, by cutting down the part of the victim D (age 68) to escape out of the damaged guard room, and by pushing ahead with the victim, such as the victim, etc.

3. On June 12, 2015, at the front of the above guard room, the Defendant: (a) reported 112 to the Defendant that he would be free of disturbance on the front of the above guard room; and (b) sent out to G, the Defendant: (c) “F of the police station E zone belonging to the police station E zone of the Defendant, who was called the Defendant, and G, without any justifiable reason.” (d) deemed the face of the police officer prone to drinking; (b) one time as a drinking f; and (c) twice as a drinking part of G police officer intending to restrain him; (d) two times as a drinking part of H’s face of the E zone of the police station E zone of the Defendant, which arrived at the same place upon receiving a request for support; and (e) assaulted the Defendant on the part of the patrol officer.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1.With respect to G, F, and D.