When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On May 24, 2018, the Defendant confirmed the content of this report by the victim D (51 tax, south) who is a police officer, who received a report (112 reported (164 times) based on the drinking value trial expenses and a plaque) and dispatched to the site at the front of the Cheongju-si C cafeteria, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-si, and used it to calculate the drinking value to the Defendant and return home, and on the ground that the Defendant told the victim that “I would not fright tobacco to the face of the victim because I would not get out of tobacco, I would like to say that “I would like to fright the face of the victim by a tobacco.”

Does the police avoid tobacco outside, and is the superior of the police;

police officer Dal Doz.

The victim openly insultingd the victim by pointing out such a brush “Woo” in a large brush.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;