A. The relationship between the parties is that the plaintiff entered into a subcontract with the non-party 1 (hereinafter referred to as the "non-party 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "non-party 11), the non-party 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "non-party 11") and the non-party 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "non-party 111") and the non-party 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "non-party 11, the non-party 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "non-party 11") and the non-party 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "non-party 111, the non-party 11, the non-party 11, the non-party 12, the non-party 11, the non-party 11, the non-party 1

B. (1) The Plaintiff and the non-party subcontractor entered into a subcontract between the Plaintiff and the non-party subcontractor on January 18, 2007. The Plaintiff entered into a subcontract with each of the following terms: (a) the contract amount as to the course works during the expansion works; (b) the construction period from January 18, 2007 to August 31, 2007; and (c) the construction period as the period of construction; and (d) the non-party company entered the subcontract with each of the construction works stated in the attached Table 1 of the Subcontract Details column as indicated in the attached Table 1 of the same Table on each date as indicated in the same Table on each date; and (c) the subcontract amount as indicated in the attached Table 1 of the attached Table 1 of the Subcontract Terms and Conditions; and (d) the subcontract amount as indicated in the attached Table 1 of the same Table on each of the above subcontracts (hereinafter “each of the instant subcontract”).

(2) Since then, the Plaintiff and the Nonparty Company concluded a modified contract with the same content as the changed termination date, and the changed amount, on each day indicated in the attached Table 1. The attached Table 1.

[Written Contract of this case]

4. Contract performance guarantee: 10% of the contract amount.