beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.11.24 2014구합66892

등록취소 취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details and details of the disposition;

A. On December 5, 2005, the Plaintiff acquired the qualification as a certified labor affairs consultant, and on July 10, 2006, registered the commencement of duties to the Minister of Labor (the present Minister of Employment and Labor).

B. On June 18, 2014, the Defendant took disciplinary action against the Plaintiff under Article 20 of the Certified Public Labor Attorney Act on the ground that “The following facts are recognized and they violate Article 13 subparag. 1 and 12(1) of the Certified Public Labor Attorney Act.”

(hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”) ① On September 2, 2011, the case was filed by B (hereinafter “B”) on behalf of the representative director, subcontractor’s representative, personal information, and delayed payment of the substitute payment, and submitted false report, evidence, and document to enable 178 members of the subcontractor and individual constructor to receive the substitute payment total amount of KRW 765,370,590 on behalf of B (hereinafter “B”), in collusion with the representative director, subcontractor’s representative, personal constructor, etc., who are not entitled to substitute payment, to falsely prepare and submit the payment record of daily labor cost, personal information, and details of arrears to the subcontractor and individual constructor who are employed by B.

(2) On October 21, 201, the case of claiming substitute payment by C (hereinafter “C”) on behalf of the representative director, subcontractor’s representative, personal constructor, etc., the subcontractor and personal constructor’s employees, who are not those entitled to substitute payment, prepared and submitted false personal information, details of work, and details of overdue payment by 27 persons who were totaled 16,986,960 won of substitute payment, and submitted false report, evidentiary documents, and documents to unlawfully receive substitute payment by 166,96,960 won in advance.

(2) On August 31, 201, the case of claiming substitute payment by D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) is represented on behalf of the representative director, subcontractor representative, personal constructor, etc., and the subcontractor and personal constructor, who are not entitled to substitute payment, are employed in collusion with the representative director, subcontractor representative, personal constructor, etc.