If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On February 20, 2013, the Defendant, at the time of the dispute with the victim E as a result of noise in the previous floor, displayed the victim’s image taken by the cell phone at the time of the dispute with the victim E at the time of the previous floor noise in the Jung-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, 107 Dong 806, and damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out the fact that “It is necessary to know of the tin-to-date tin tin tin tin tin tin tin tin tin tin tin tin ,

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to E and D;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment is that the defendant suffers from a dispute with the victim. However, considering the fact that the defendant shows dynamic images that may impair the honor of the victim to D, etc. who have no particular interest, and then uses the expression 'tin-time' and then delivers such words to the victim's child, the amount of fine for the summary order is appropriate.